The Baby Killers

I keep promising myself not to mention the wars for these reasons: the invaders couldn’t care less about their crimes or their critics, my friends think I’ve become a ranting bore and many of today’s citizens have more pressing worries than the serial massacres of toddlers in badlands. Bad stuff keeps happening. It keeps being denied. And is soon forgotten.

From the very first days of the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, the US air force has specialised in dropping bombs on family compounds supposedly containing “militants”. Often they are not at home, unlike the women and children and elderly, whose bodies are eventually spread on the ground in preparation for a mass burial, while the Pentagon issues a curt “regret”. Then it bombs the funeral. It’s happened more than once.

Another target is wedding parties. Back in July 2002, snug in their AC-130 bombers, American pilots wiped out a celebration in Uruzgan province, killing 48 civilians - mostly women and children – and injuring 117 locals. It’s happened more than once.

It happened again this July, when a US missile strike slaughtered 27 guests in Nangarhar province, 19 of them women and children. When locals arrived at the scene to care for the injured and collect the dead, four more bombs were unleashed, killing the bride and two of her relatives. 

It’s been much the same in Iraq and Pakistan, though barely reported. We kill on the hint of a whisper, kill because we can, kill because we rule the skies. Even as the Pentagon continued to deny its August midnight massacre of 60 children and 15 women in Nawabad, in the district of Azizabad, Afghanistan, the bombs were raining down on a religious school in Waziristan, a tribal area of north west Pakistan. (The fourth US assault this week on its “ally”). Unleashed by two drones, the strikes killed 23 people, though not the intended target, Jalaluddin Haqqani, a religious scholar and former commander of the US-backed mujahideen which trounced the Russians (“Charlie’s War”).  Twenty others were wounded, mainly women and children.

The guys who push the buttons at the Creech Air Force base in Nevada, managed to murder one of Haqqani wives, his sister-in-law, a sister, two nieces, eight grandchildren and a male relative. “Sitting in a virtual cockpit is not as exciting as flying a fighter jet”, noted CNN’s breathless Laurie Ure, “but unmanned attack-plane pilots can enjoy a normal workday schedule”. Captain Matt Dean agrees,"seeing bad guys on the screen and watching them possibly get dispatched, and then going down to the Taco Bell for lunch, it's kind of surreal”. This is the Pentagon’s version of Second Life, soon to be known as Exit Life. One day it will come to a war near you.

The latest unmanned bomber is called the Reaper and caries the same payload as an F-16 fighter plane, but happily, Laurie assures us - ‘its pilots are not put in harm's way.’ Of course not, they’re eating tacos.  Col. Chris Chambliss is commander of the 432nd Air Expeditionary Wing, which was established last year as the first unit dedicated to unmanned aerial systems and remote controlled assassinations. "We're the victims of our own success”, he tells a Defence correspondent, while he plays tapes of the victims of the Reaper. Chambliss says there is an “insatiable appetite” for his systems and their “capabilities” and his air-wing is currently flying 28 combat air patrols around the clock, and rising.

On Sept 8, while the boys from Creech were wolfing down their tacos, the London Times  published an eight-minute of video of the massacre in Azizabad, the “most compelling evidence to emerge” of 75 civilian deaths. The hero here is an unnamed Afghan doctor who arrived at the scene with a cell phone and shot footage of weeping parents, injured children and charred babies - line upon line of  shrouded corpses. Along with attack helicopters and a C130 Spectre gunship, armed drones were used in the attack.

And so it goes, this depressing spiral of wars without end, arms trading, Government lies, the obliteration of the innocent and an insane certainty that our Kilpingesque military missions are wise and noble. Oh yes, Australia’s on board, fists flying. We’re building a bigger navy to defend our sea lanes from, er, what? Oh yes, Asia’s ascent. George Bush, Barrack Obama and John McCain are pushing for a “surge” in Afghanistan, a country which never attacked anyone. True, it did harbor Osama bin Laden, just as America once harbored the Shah of Iran and still harbors anti-Castro terrorists and fully backed General Pinochet and nourished Pervez Musharraf  and still trains torturers, etc, but as yet no army has invaded Washington.

Why are we in Afghanistan? “To spread democracy”. Surely it’s death we’re spreading. If we cared about democracy we’d be listening to the locals, who want us out. In the most recent survey of public opinion, (this June, prior to the latest bout of killings), "more than six out of ten of those interviewed ... said that foreign troops should leave."  And let’s not mention the  encroaching famine -  no-one else does.

The only war worth fighting anymore, is the war against carbon emissions. Instead of which, we’re being sucked into an arms build-up, which will further scorch the planet. The chance of changing this priority is slim, given the West’s long devotion to bloody combat.  According to Johan Galtung, a longtime peace researcher and futurist, the “number of people killed in overt Pentagon-driven military action after the Second World War is now between 13 and 17 million’. That’s not a misprint. The number of people killed in covert action is “at least 6 million”. Such figures are not to be found on Fox News, or even in the New York Times.

So while war may be hell, it’s as American as apple pie, and  unlikely to disappear before we do. It also explains why John McCain is edging ever closer the White House. In an era when Geneva is mocked, dissent ineffective and baby killing tolerated, it is strangely perfect that a presidential aspirant and his running mate should have blood on their hands, whether of Vietnamese civilians or an Alaskan Moose. If America signs up to this dark adventure, forget about calming the weather, restoring the eco system and embarking on an age of sustainability and transformation. All you’ll get is a blood bath.

Footnote 1: Within hours of publishing this piece, it is reported that US drones fired several missiles at a house of “militant” in North Waziristan, leaving 12 people dead, including women and children. Eight others have been taken to hospital. They’ll be dancing on the tables at Taco Bell’s. September 2008

Footnote 2: And then I found this poweful, barely visited video from DecentralizedTommy which adds dimension to my threadbare words:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJu2xVd1sGE

clip1 - McCain learns that exports to Iran have increased during the Bush admin. Cigarettes being the number one export to Iran.

McCain then says, "maybe that's a way of killing them".

clip2 - "Remote Control Killers" Cap. Matt Dean tells of murdering Afghanis with "The Reaper" while sitting in an air-conditioned room, in a nice comfy armchair 7,500 miles away, near Las Vegas…

A HEARTFELT MESSAGE FROM RUPERT MURDOCH'S AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPER, RE-EDITED

McCain on message the nose

The Republican Nominee is friendly to Australia’s needs 

FOR Australians, the US presidential election on November 4 is looking like a contest between the a dickhead and the heart. Democratic nominee Barack Obama appeals to sentiment and the sense of a tide in history in many of us, though not to our proprietor. If Australians were able to vote, as some audacious commentators on the Left have suggested, Senator Obama would outpoll Republican John McCain by two to one…

But in a considered opinion article commissioned by The Australian and published on Tuesday, Senator McCain offers no sound reasons why the hypothetical Australian vote should consider swinging his way. He sets out an  incoherent foreign policy embracing patronizing the Asia-Pacific region. He sets out a clearmuddle-headed approach to engaging with China while barely acknowledging that country's shortcomings. He shows an unrealistic approach and intrepid downplaying to climate change and nuclear arms control. And he shows himself – whoopee! - to be in favour of US manipulated free trade. In other words, just the kind of partner Australia Rupert Murdoch needs in the region.

In an assessment of Senator McCain's article, the director of studies at the Lowy Institute for International Policy in Australia, Andrew Shearer, points out: "Unlike Obama, McCain has a realbogus connection to Australia and a deeply personal embarrassing engagement in the alliance and our shared history of invading nations and killing civilians." Mr Shearer, a former foreign policy adviser to war criminal John Howard, shares the view that the Republican nominee, who visited Australia in 2006, though no-one remembers it, boosts the worth - lessens the credibility and independence - of this country's role in international relations.

It was also reassuring to see the Republican does not views security entirely through the prism of September 11. Senator McCain has presented strong credentials as a candidate with whom Australia Mr Murdoch can do business, thus making him automatically unfit for office - September 25

Comments

[Remote Controlled]

Choose lullabies, nature sounds or heartbeat with adjustable volume control. http://www.apache.co.za/

[Understanding PPC]

I just came across your blog about and wanted to drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with the information you have posted here. I have a site Understanding PPC http://understanding-ppc.110mb.com so I know what I'm talking about when I say your site is top-notch! Keep up the great work, you are providing a great resource on the Internet here!

[cassie]

hello,
sickeningly hypocritical that the australian government has not signed the document to let oxfam provide abortion funding as thats-killing babies-
regardless of what one believes about abortion the state is exposed as duplicitious. especially considering overpopulation is a factor causing wars. and women's freedom to choose for themselves should be a priority issue. or what are we doing there really?